The Relationship of Visual Preference for Traditional Village Landscape with View on Development Approaches in China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the sustainable development of traditional Chinese village landscapes has been constantly challenged.Thus, this study intends to explore the relationship between local residents' views on development approaches and their visual preferences for traditional village landscapes, in order to guide planners and decision-makers toward more sustainable development policies and strategies that are consistent with local residents' views.The survey results from 400 participants in Guilin, Guangxi regarding visual preferences show that the local residents mostly prefer the mixed village landscape that retains the traditional characteristics of the elements while also integrating the needs for modern living and material styles.For development approaches, the results also show that the local residents believe that the development of landscapes should be based on two main views: (a) environmental preservation and (b) moderate utilization.It is also found that the views on the development approach have a significant effect on the visual preferences of traditional villages.The visual preference for the mixed-style village landscape is most affected by the development view of moderate utilization, followed by the development view of environmental preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it