Foreign experience of implementation of certain forms of public control over police activities and ways of its implementation in Ukraine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to develop an effective national model of public control over police activities in general and to clarify the main aspects of interaction between the public and the police, the article analyzes the foreign experience of public control over police activities and highlights the ways of its implementation in Ukraine. The systematic basis of the study of forms of public control over police activities in foreign countries and the methods of their implementation is the principle of selectivity, the basis of which is the study of the international experience of politically, economically, and socially successful countries (France, Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Canada, Japan) in in which the public is actively involved in police activities. As a result of the study, separate ways of implementing foreign experience in public control of police activities were proposed, in particular, the expediency was determined: to define and normatively establish the grounds, forms and methods of involving citizens in the protection of public order in the new Law of Ukraine «On Public Participation in the Protection of Public Order», which needs development and adoption; to regulate in the Law «On the National Police» one of the forms of public control over police activities - participation of citizens on a voluntary basis in the protection of public order, detection, recording and investigation of the circumstances of commission of offenses and crimes and taking measures to eliminate the causes and conditions of their commission; to develop and adopt state and municipal programs for public participation in public order and security, which should determine effective, not formal grounds, forms and procedures for such activities, including establishing the mechanism of interaction between the police and the public in this area; to create the Association for the Support of Police Activities as a public organization created on a voluntary basis by citizens to participate in the activities of the police, including to improve the provision of police services to the population and public control over police activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".