MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390365186 · doi:10.3917/rhmc.g2000.47n1.0069

Jeunesse et désordre social: les "coureurs de nuit" à Laval au XVIIIe siècle

2000· article· fr· W4390365186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frédérique Pitou

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les soirées et les nuits des Lavallois du XVIII e siècle sont souvent troublées par des bandes de « coureurs de nuit ». L'examen des archives de justice permet de préciser leur identité, les types de jeux et de violences qu'ils affectionnent et qui peuvent souvent être interprétées comme un défi à l'ordre social. La spécificité de cette délinquance tiendrait donc non seulement à la nature des actions commises mais aussi aux intentions des acteurs et au regard que portent sur eux les adultes en général et les magistrats en particulier; elle témoigne de la place de la jeunesse dans la société. The evenings and the nights to inhabitants of Laval during the xvnte century are often disturbed by parties of « coureurs de nuit ». The examination of the records of justice permit to specîfy their identity, the types of their plays and the violence they like ; they can often be interpreted like a challenge with the social order. The specificity of this delinquency can be connect with the nature of their actions and also with the intentions of the actors and with the way adults and magistrates look at them ; it shows the place of youth in the society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d’histoire moderne et contemporaineSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207