Negotiating Tradition and Modernity: A Case Study of Hybrid Political Cultures in Village Governance, North Tapanuli, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the intersection of modern values and traditional knowledge within the political culture of village governance in North Tapanuli Regency.The hybridization of these elements is considered critical, especially in light of the apparent inadequacy of modernization theory to drive development in developing countries.Seven key informants were involved in this research, chosen based on their familiarity with the Toba Batak traditional system and their involvement in village governance, such as holding the position of village head.Traditional knowledge informs the selection of village heads through a Toba Batak custom known as 'si soli-soli'.This traditional process occurs alongside the government-regulated direct elections for village heads.The resulting cultural hybridity in electing village heads has led to a more equitable and peaceful redistribution of political power.This fusion of traditional and modern practices yields a robust political legacy, compelling the elected village head to maintain the honor of their clan.The article concludes that the dialogue between traditional knowledge and modern values continues to shape the political culture of village governance in North Tapanuli Regency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".