MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390395844 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3817875/v1

Exploring Economic Adaptations: Qualitative Insights into the Metal Industry Amidst Shifting Towards Renewable Energy

2023· preprint· en· W4390395844 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Reynolds, Lily Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessSupply chainIndustrial organizationDiversification (marketing strategy)Thematic analysisSustainabilityRenewable energyTransformative learningQualitative researchMarketingEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This qualitative study delves into economic adaptations observed within the metal industry in response to the transition towards renewable energy sources. Through semi-structured interviews with key industry stakeholders, the research aimed to uncover strategic shifts, challenges, and opportunities encountered by metal companies amid this transformative phase. The methodology involved in-depth semi-structured interviews, allowing for comprehensive exploration of experiences, perspectives, and strategic maneuvers within the metal industry. Thematic analysis of these interviews offered insights into how companies are adapting their practices to align with the demands of renewable energy technologies. Findings from the study revealed a deliberate shift in the industry's focus towards critical metals essential for renewable energy applications, such as lithium and rare earth elements. This adaptation involves significant investments in retooling production lines and exploring novel extraction methods to meet the burgeoning demand. Challenges related to ensuring a resilient supply chain emerged prominently. The industry faces risks associated with geopolitical tensions and market fluctuations, prompting the exploration of diversified sourcing strategies and alternative reserves to fortify the supply chain against disruptions. The study's limitations lie in its qualitative nature, limiting broader quantitative assessments, and the snapshot nature of the research, capturing dynamics at a specific time frame. Practically, the research offers valuable insights for industry stakeholders, guiding strategic decision-making, supply chain fortification, and market diversification efforts. Socially, the alignment of the industry with renewable energy transitions holds promise for enhanced sustainability and reduced environmental impacts. This study contributes original insights into economic adaptations within the metal industry amidst the shift towards renewable energy sources, offering a nuanced understanding of industry responses and their implications. However, the qualitative approach may limit generalizability, and continuous monitoring is necessary to track long-term industry trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.376
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.065 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207