Equivalent-time-active-cavitation-imaging enables vascular-resolution blood-brain-barrier-opening-therapy planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Linking cavitation and anatomy was found to be important for predictable outcomes in focused-ultrasound blood-brain-barrier-opening and requires high resolution cavitation mapping. However, cavitation mapping techniques for planning and monitoring of therapeutic procedures either (1) do not leverage the full resolution capabilities of ultrasound imaging or (2) place constraints on the length of the therapeutic pulse. This study aimed to develop a high-resolution technique that could resolve vascular anatomy in the cavitation map. Approach. Herein, we develop BandPass-sampled-equivalent-time-active-cavitation-imaging (BP-ETACI), derived from bandpass sampling and dual-frequency contrast imaging at 12.5 MHz to produce cavitation maps prior and during blood–brain barrier opening with long therapeutic bursts using a 1.5 MHz focused transducer in the brain of C57BL/6 mice. Main results. The BP-ETACI cavitation maps were found to correlate with the vascular anatomy in ultrasound localization microscopy vascular maps and in histological sections. Cavitation maps produced from non-blood-brain-barrier disrupting doses showed the same cavitation-bearing vasculature as maps produced over entire blood-brain-barrier opening procedures, allowing use for (1) monitoring focused-ultrasound blood-brain-barrier-opening (FUS-BBBO), but also for (2) therapy planning and target verification. Significance. BP-ETACI is versatile, created high resolution cavitation maps in the mouse brain and is easily translatable to existing FUS-BBBO experiments. As such, it provides a means to further study cavitation phenomena in FUS-BBBO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".