MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390404096 · doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1344815

Editorial: Women in science: structural geology and tectonics 2022

2023· editorial· en· W4390404096 on OpenAlexaff
María Ortuño, Magdalena Scheck‐Wenderoth, S. J. C. Oliva

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTectonicsStructural geologyEarth scienceSolid earthPlate tectonicsGeophysicsGeochemistrySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gender Equality is the fifth of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proclaimed by the United Nations for the 2030 Agenda (UN General Assembly, 2015). We are only a few years away from 2030 and we still have much work to do to achieve gender equality, also in academia. In particular in the experimental and technical careers (the so-called STEM fields), women still account for only 28% and 40% of engineering and computer science graduates, respectively and according to the United Nations. In academia, women in science contend with shorter and less well-paid careers, only 12% representation in national science academies, and underrepresentation in high-profile journals both as authors and as editors (UNESCO et al., 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.236
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.236
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207