MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Genre Ecleticism of Anthony Trollope’s “The Way We Live Now”: Breaking Genre Boundaries?

2022· article· en· W4390424138 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Boris M. Proskurnin

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Literature in the Context of Culture · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OxfordMcMaster University
KeywordsComedyDepictionInvectiveLiteratureArtAestheticsPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the novel "The Way We Live Now", according to many literary critics, one of the masterpieces of the writer. The novel is considered from the point of view of its place in Trollope's system of creative work on the whole, the increase of the satirical and invective principle in the writer's novel practice in particular, but mainly – in the aspect of the multiplot structure of this panoramic and satirical novel and, accordingly, the coexistence in the artistic whole of the work of several genre modes: social, everyday life depiction (comedy of manners), psychological, love, satirical. The article proves the correspondence of Trollope's multi-genre thinking to his realistic principle of reproducing life in its integrity, fluidity and characterology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Literature in the Context of CultureSame topicCultural, Linguistic, Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207