MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390428602 · doi:10.3917/docsi.393.0138e

Education and research for marketing and quality management in libraries = La formation et la recherche sur le marketing et la gestion de la qualité en bibliothèque : satellite meeting = colloque satellite, Québec, 14-16 août 2001 . Édité par Réjean Savard. München : Saur, 2002. – X-326 p. – (IFLA Publications, ISSN 0344-6891 ; 99). – ISBN 3-598-21829-X : 78 €

2002· article· fr· W4390428602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Éric Sutter

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l Information · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteMarketing researchLibrary scienceQuality (philosophy)Political scienceBusinessMarketingEngineeringComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article disponible en ligne à l'adresse https:/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l InformationSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207