The Development of Challenge-Based Learning with Social Media Model to Promote Technology Literacy Skills for Learners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The challenge-based learning with social media model, or CBLS model, to promote technology literacy skills for learners is based on the concepts of challenge-based learning process integrated with the ideas to use social media as a tool for the management of learning activities. The objectives of this research are (1) to synthesize the CBLS model to promote technology literacy skills for learners, (2) to design the CBLS model to promote technology literacy skills for learners, and (3) to study the results of the design of the CBLS model to promote technology literacy skills for learners. The participants in this research are seven experts from different institutions in higher education, including the four males and three females, all of whom are experts in educational technology, which are specialized in design instruction system. These participants were all given confidentiality and anonymity. The results of this research show that (1) the overall suitability of the design of the CBLS model is at the high level (mean = 4.49, SD = 0.32), and (2) the suitability of the elements of the CBLS model is at the highest level (mean = 4.93, SD = 0.19).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".