Review on mechanical and functional properties of refractory high-entropy alloy films by magnetron sputtering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Refractory high-entropy films (RHEFs), as multi-component materials, have garnered significant attention due to their potential use in high-temperature applications. RHEFs are endowed with unique microstructural and functional properties due to the use of refractory elements. In this review, we examine the recent state of research on RHEFs deposited by the magnetron sputtering technique. The microstructure of RHEFs has been analyzed/explored and the mechanical properties as well as the main hardening mechanisms of these films are discussed. Furthermore, functional properties such as resistance to corrosion and wear, electrical and irradiation performances, and high-temperature oxidation were evaluated. RHEFs can meet market demand in the field of engineering materials. However, many challenges, such as low ductility at room temperature, remain to be overcome. This review provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of RHEFs produced using magnetron sputtering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it