Retrieving freeze-thaw states using deep learning with remote sensing data in permafrost landscapes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The soil freeze–thaw (FT) cycle is a critical component of the terrestrial cryosphere and plays a significant role in hydrological, ecological, climatic, and biogeochemical processes within permafrost landscapes. The FT states can be monitored with in-situ field measurements, but these procedures are costly and limited to single chosen sites. Remote sensing data provides the opportunity to collect information repeatedly across extensive geographical areas. To explore a more effective way to monitor the FT states in the terrestrial cryosphere, in this study, we used microwave and optical remote sensing data and introduced the Deep Learning approach to simulate the soil FT states in the western part of Nunavik, Canada. Two networks, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), were trained and tested with over 35,000 and approximately 54,000 randomly selected data samples, respectively. The trained CNN networks outperformed the MLP networks, achieving the highest testing accuracy of 95.67% and the highest validation accuracy of 87.28% based on ground truth data from 32 measurement stations from all seasons across the year. This study proposed the reference periods concept for convenient labeling in data preparation and tested different combinations of influence variables to achieve better transferability of the method for future studies. Our findings offer a more effective way to monitor FT states in the terrestrial cryosphere, offering valuable insights into the consequences of climate change on permafrost landscapes. Moreover, the suggested deep learning approach can be easily expanded when additional input sources are accessible. This expansion has the potential to further improve the model's performance for the FT retrieval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".