Predictive Modeling of Hardness Values and Phase Fraction Percentages in Micro-Alloyed Steel during Heat Treatment Using AI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we have proposed an AI-based model that can simultaneously predict the hardness and phase fraction percentages of micro-alloyed steel with a predefined chemical composition and thermomechanical processing conditions. Specifically, the model uses a feed-forward neural network enhanced by the ensemble method. The model has been trained on experimental data derived from continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagrams of 39 different steels. The inputs to the model include a cooling profile defined by a set of time-temperature values and the chemical composition of the steel. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the validated model to understand the impact of key input variables, including individual alloys and the thermomechanical processing conditions. This analysis, which measures the variability in output in response to changes in a specific input variable, showed excellent agreement with experimental data and the trends in the literature. Thus, our model not only predicts steel properties under varied cooling conditions but also aligns with existing theoretical knowledge and experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".