MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390459665 · doi:10.53555/jaz.v45i1.3123

Quality Improvement In Vehicle Service Process

2023· article· en· W4390459665 on OpenAlexaff
Mr. C. Prajwal Kumar, G. Prasanthi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Advanced Zoology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCustomer Service AssuranceCustomer advocacyBusinessCustomer retentionService qualityService guaranteeService (business)Service level objectiveCustomer satisfactionCustomer to customerMarketingLoyalty business modelService delivery frameworkComputer scienceService design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Customer service is a multidimensional and extensive notion with numerous variables that directly affect customer satisfaction and customer loyalty throughout the customer life cycle. In order to make customer satisfied, it is necessary for the companies to add numerous factors into practice to provide nonstop evaluation and enhancement of their service conditioning such as addressing customers queries and meeting customer’s prospects. When the vehicle is in the service center, every customer wants to know the vehicle status. For this, the customer has to call the service center and gather the information orally. Due to lack of trust, there might be a friction between the customer and service center when there is a detention in the listed time.In the present work step by step information to the client about the vehicle will be given by developing an online link Universal Resource Locator (URL). In the service center the data of vehicle and service updates are to be entered by system operator. Once the login credentials are furnished by the customer, the updates of service completed will be known and the customer can anticipate the time taken for total service and vehicle delivery. Giving this information to the customer can provide a better experience and more satisfaction with the service center that in turn may improve the quality of service by the service department. It is proposed to develop this process for Sri Durga Automotives Private Limited, Anantapuramu, an authorized sales and service center of Maruti Suzuki India Limited[6] [7].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Of Advanced ZoologySame topicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207