MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390461702 · doi:10.1672/ucrt083-264

A Call for Action to Protect Vernal Ponds in Ontario

2017· article· en· W4390461702 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gail Krantzberg

Bibliographic record

VenueWetland Science and Practice · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityNature Conservancy of Canada
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsThreatened speciesEphemeral keyWetlandHabitatGeographyBiodiversityEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vernal ponds are broadly defined as ephemeral wetlands that predictably form in permanent basins during the cooler part of the year. They are considered to be vernal since they dry up during the summer months. According to Zedler (2003) they are particularly abundant on the Pacific Coast and in various forms in the glaciated landscapes of the north and northeast of the United States. In Ontario, they are generally situated in shallow depressions within forested terrain. Vernal ponds serve an important local biodiversity function due to their situation within surrounding terrestrial habitats. As with other wetlands in Ontario, vernal ponds are threatened by numerous anthropogenic stressors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWetland Science and PracticeSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207