Determination of duration, threshold and spatiotemporal distribution of extreme continuous precipitation in nine major river basins in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
China is one of the countries most severely affected by extreme precipitation, and it is urgent to carry out relevant research on the spatiotemporal distribution of extreme precipitation in China. Compared with single-day precipitation events, heavy precipitation events often last for multiple days and have greater potential disaster impacts, such as floods and mudslides. Therefore, in this study, we focus on continuous precipitation (CP) events for analysis. In order to determine the most probable duration of continuous heavy precipitation events, we innovatively adopted two time-frequency variation methods, namely Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Then through Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) and multifractal DFA (MF-DFA) methods, extreme CP thresholds are extracted according to the fluctuation characteristics of the CP series. The results show that the average duration of heavy precipitation in the Pearl River Basin (PRB) area was the longest (up to 7.7 days), followed by the Continental Basin (CB) area (7.6 days). The Haihe River Basin (HRB) area had the shortest duration of heavy precipitation (5.0 days), followed by the Huaihe River Basin (HURB) area (5.9 days). The extreme CP threshold in the Southeast Basin (SEB) area was the largest (112.17 mm), followed by the PRB area (108.22 mm). The extreme CP threshold in the CB area was the smallest (20.17 mm), followed by the Yellow River Basin (YRB) area (44.31 mm). Through mutation and trend testing to evaluate the changing state of the extreme CP time series, it was found that, with one exception (HRB), the average extreme CP after the mutation in the watershed areas was larger than that before the mutation, and eight watersheds showed an upward trend in extreme CP. This suggests that most watershed areas in China are at risk of extreme CP increases. This study can provide an important reference for the analysis of extreme CP in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".