“I Was and Remain on Trial”: M.K. Sidorov and the Regional Administration (1840s–1870s)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article, based on the biography of the outstanding Russian merchant M.K. Sidorov (1823-1887), characterizes the interaction of representatives of private capital with regional authorities in remote, inaccessible and sparsely populated territories of the Russian Empire: in Arkhangelsk province, Western and Eastern Siberia.About a dozen cases of conflicts between M.K. Sidorov and high-ranking officials have been revealed.His opinion on the goals of the administrative apparatus and the productive, from his point of view, attitude of the authorities to private (primarily merchant) initiative has been considered.The examples of M.K. Sidorov's positive assessment of administrators, including N.P. Rumyantsev, Minister of Commerce of the first quarter of the 19 th century, and Prince A.B. Lobanov-Rostovsky, Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs in the 1870s, have been given.The presented material testifies not only to the personal qualities of a particular person -M.K. Sidorov, who undoubtedly had a difficult character, but also in general about how public-private partnership developed during the 1840s -1870s -in many ways, a transitional period in the economic, cultural and socio-political development of Russia, when new trends in a variety of areas became more noticeable.The success of the development of the northern outskirts of the country was largely determined by how successfully it was possible to establish cooperation between regional authorities and private entrepreneurs, whose activities, ultimately, were aimed at achieving a common goal -the involvement of hard-toreach territories with harsh climatic conditions into a single economic and socio-cultural space of the empire.However, the revealed facts from the life of M.K. Sidorov allow us to illustrate how the mutual interest of the management staff and merchants in combining efforts and capital for various reasons often led to serious conflicts, and sometimes to open confrontation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it