A Comprehensive Study on Nitrogen Fixation and Growth and Development Regulation of Leguminous Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legumes are important nitrogen fixers that play significant roles in agricultural sustainability and ecosystem functioning. This review studied the relationship between nitrogen fixation and growth & development regulation in legumes. Firstly, it introduced the mechanism of legume nitrogen fixation, including root nodule formation with rhizobia, the nitrogenase system and nitrogen fixation process, as well as the interaction between nodule formation and the nitrogenase system. Secondly, it discussed the impacts of nodule formation on plant growth and development, signaling communication between rhizobia and plants， and rhizobia-induced plant metabolic regulation. Further, it summarized the advances in molecular mechanism research, agricultural applications of legume nitrogen fixation and growth & development regulation, as well as its ecological impacts. Finally, it proposed future research directions and challenges, including unknown mechanisms of legume nitrogen fixation, interactions with other growth and development regulatory pathways, and application prospects in nitrogen management and agricultural sustainability. This review provides important references for further studies in the field of legume nitrogen fixation and growth & development regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".