MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390478652 · doi:10.53510/nsj.v4i2.211

HUBUNGAN DUKUNGAN KELUARGA DENGAN KEPATUHAN PERILAKU DIET RENDAH GARAM PADA PENDERITA HIPERTENSI DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS MELINTANG

2023· article· id· W4390478652 on OpenAlexaff
Agustina Agustina, Ardiansya, Rezka Nurvinanda

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Science Journal (NSJ) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPhysicsNursing scienceMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latar Belakang: Penelitian ini di latar belakangi oleh fenomena Hipertensi yang merupakan masalah kesehatan utama saat ini telah menyebar ke seluruh dunia dan juga merupakan salah satu penyebab kematian yang paling umum. Karena tekanan darah tinggi tidak dapat ditularkan dari satu orang ke orang lain, itu adalah penyakit ini disebut penyakit kronis tidak menular. Tujuan: penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Hubungan dukungan keluarga dengan pengaruh prilaku diet rendah garam pada penderita Hipertensi di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Melintang Pangkalpinang tahun 2023. Metode: penelitan Jenis penelitian deskriptif korelasi dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Berdasarkan perhitungan menggunakan rumus diatas didapatkan hasil besar sampel 96,6, dari perhitungan ini dibulatkan menjadi 97 sampel. Ditambahkan 10% dari jumlah sampel sehingga hasil yang di dapatkan 108 responden. Hasil: penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Berdasarkan uji statistik chi-square dalam penelitian ini diperoleh nilai p-value = 0,000< 0,05, ini menunjukan ada hubungan antara dukungan keluarga dengan kepatuhan perilaku diet rendah garam pada penderita hipertensi. Kesimpulan: Ada hubungan dukungan keluarga emosional, informasional, instrumental, penilaian dengan kepatuhan perilaku diet rendah garam pada penderita hipertensi.. Kemudian kepatuhan diet rendah garam pada responden mayoritas terbanyak dalam kategori patuh yaitu 84 orang (77,8%), dan tidak patuh 24 orang (22,2%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing Science Journal (NSJ)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207