Intelligent Environment-Adaptive GNSS/INS Integrated Positioning with Factor Graph Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) applied to intelligent transport systems in urban areas suffer from multipath and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) effects due to the signal reflections from high-rise buildings, which seriously degrade the accuracy and reliability of vehicles in real-time applications. Accordingly, the integration between GNSS and inertial navigation systems (INSs) could be utilized to improve positioning performance. However, the fixed GNSS solution uncertainty of the conventional integration method cannot determine the fluctuating GNSS reliability in fast-changing urban environments. This weakness becomes solvable using a deep learning model for sensing the ambient environment intelligently, and it can be further mitigated using factor graph optimization (FGO), which is capable of generating robust solutions based on historical data. This paper mainly develops the adaptive GNSS/INS loosely coupled system on FGO, along with the fixed-gain Kalman filter (KF) and adaptive KF (AKF) being taken as comparisons. The adaptation is aided by a convolutional neural network (CNN), and the feasibility is verified using data from different grades of receivers. Compared with the integration using fixed-gain KF, the proposed adaptive FGO (AFGO) maintains the 100% positioning availability and reduces the overall 2D positioning error by up to 70% in the aspects of both root mean square error (RMSE) and standard deviation (STD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".