MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of Real Concept Drift Under Noisy Data Stream

2023· article· en· W4390481894 on OpenAlexaff
Sirvan Parasteh, Samira Sadaoui, Mohammad Khosravani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcept driftComputer scienceData streamBayesian probabilityData stream miningArtificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)SurpriseEntropy (arrow of time)Data miningNoise (video)Streaming dataPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concept drift detection in noisy data streams is challenging yet essential. This paper introduces NPRDD, a new concept drift detection algorithm that is robust to noise and accurately identifies Real drifts. NPRDD operates on a moving window of recent data, utilizing predicted class probabilities and cross-entropy-based surprise measures to weigh real drift candidates. In line with the Bayesian definition of Real concept drift, NPRDD considers a sample as a drift candidate when the classifier makes an error but is highly confident in its judgment. We evaluate NPRDD on synthetic datasets by varying the noise levels and comparing its performance with other well-established methods. Our results show that NPRDD outperforms other methods regarding ROC-AUC and Accuracy metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207