MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390484097 · doi:10.21474/ijar01/17962

EFFECT OF SWEDISH MASSAGE AND HOT MUD WITH CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA APPLICATION AMONG KNEE JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS CASES-A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

2023· article· en· W4390484097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMassageMedicinePhysical therapyWOMACVisual analogue scaleRandomized controlled trialJoint painSurgeryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is a most common type of degenerative joint disease-causing substantial pain and disability globally. Despite affecting over 20 million individuals in the United States and an anticipated 100 million worldwide by 2030, the molecular mechanisms of KOA initiation and progression remain inadequately understood, with no available interventions to restore degraded cartilage or impede disease advancement. Current treatments, including medications and surgical interventions, exhibit limited efficacy and potential side effects. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a combined treatment comprising Swedish massage, hot mud, and Calotropis gigantea application in reducing pain, disability, and joint stiffness in individuals with KOA. Eighty participants (35 males, 45 females) aged 40 to 75 years with clinical knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either a Study group (Swedish massage with Hot Mud and Calotropis Gigantea leaves) or a Control group (Swedish massage with Hot Mud). Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Secondary Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) assessed pain, disability, and joint stiffness. The intervention was applied daily for 10 days, and pre- and post-intervention comparisons were analyzed. Both groups exhibited a significant reduction in pain, disability, and joint stiffness. However, the Study group demonstrated a greater reduction than the Control group, with statistically significant differences in VAS and WOMAC scores. No adverse events were reported. Calotropis gigantea, known for its anti-inflammatory properties, combined with Swedish massage and hot mud, showed a potential synergistic effect. Swedish massage enhances blood circulation and muscle relaxation, while hot mud provides heat therapy. The combination may improve the penetration of therapeutic agents, leading to more profound effects. The study suggests that the combined treatment holds promise for addressing knee-related issues. The combined treatment involving Calotropis gigantea application, Swedish massage, and hot mud demonstrated a significant reduction in knee pain, disability, and joint stiffness. The potential synergistic effect of these interventions warrants further investigation to validate their therapeutic benefits, emphasizing the need for caution and additional research to ensure safety and efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it