MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390489077 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3346470

CGTD-Net: Channel-Wise Global Transformer-Based Dual-Branch Network for Industrial Strip Steel Surface Defect Detection

2024· article· en· W4390489077 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransformerDual (grammatical number)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface defects directly affect the mechanical properties of industrial strip steel products. To evaluate the integrity of the strip steel surface, a channel-wise global Transformer-based dual-branch network (CGTD-Net) for strip steel surface defect detection, dubbed CGTD-Net, is proposed in this study. First, the strip steel surface images are preprocessed using saturation adjustment and random flipping strategies to remove unnecessary background information and improve network generalization. Second, the Swin Transformer is employed at the end of the backbone network and the negative impacts of a single channel are then mitigated by using the multichannel feature pyramid networks via Transformer, which improves the extraction ability of the global semantic information for tiny or narrow defects. Third, an edge detection branch network is constructed with a spatial–channel global attention (SCGA) module to further enhance the feature extraction on both spatial and channel information. Finally, the CGTD-Net is compared with 11 state-of-the-art methods on the NEU-DET dataset, and ablation experiments are also implemented. The comparison results, conducted on a single 3090Ti GPU, reveal that the CGTD-Net achieves a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 75.16% at 178 frames/s, outperforming other methods. The ablation experiment demonstrates that the CGTD-Net improves the mIoU by 7.83% and the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${F}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -score by 6.3% compared to the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it