MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390489077 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3346470

CGTD-Net: Channel-Wise Global Transformer-Based Dual-Branch Network for Industrial Strip Steel Surface Defect Detection

2024· article· en· W4390489077 on OpenAlexaff
Huan Liu, Chao Chen, Ruikuan Hu, Junchi Bin, Haobin Dong, Zheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransformerDual (grammatical number)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface defects directly affect the mechanical properties of industrial strip steel products. To evaluate the integrity of the strip steel surface, a channel-wise global Transformer-based dual-branch network (CGTD-Net) for strip steel surface defect detection, dubbed CGTD-Net, is proposed in this study. First, the strip steel surface images are preprocessed using saturation adjustment and random flipping strategies to remove unnecessary background information and improve network generalization. Second, the Swin Transformer is employed at the end of the backbone network and the negative impacts of a single channel are then mitigated by using the multichannel feature pyramid networks via Transformer, which improves the extraction ability of the global semantic information for tiny or narrow defects. Third, an edge detection branch network is constructed with a spatial–channel global attention (SCGA) module to further enhance the feature extraction on both spatial and channel information. Finally, the CGTD-Net is compared with 11 state-of-the-art methods on the NEU-DET dataset, and ablation experiments are also implemented. The comparison results, conducted on a single 3090Ti GPU, reveal that the CGTD-Net achieves a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 75.16% at 178 frames/s, outperforming other methods. The ablation experiment demonstrates that the CGTD-Net improves the mIoU by 7.83% and the${F}$-score by 6.3% compared to the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207