Modelo de alerta de intensidade de risco de fogo utilizando algoritmo de regressão logística ordinal de classificação
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of the study is to analyze the Ordinal Logistic Regression model to predict the classification classes associated with the risk of fire attribute. For the study provided, it was considered the data of the dataset related to the Programa Queimadas of Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais(INPE), and also the data from the Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (INMET), both of them with the data for the Parque acional do Araguaia(TO), Brazil. The idea was to validate a classification model capable of creating meaningful insights for the community, or reserve parks, making it easier to get the information associated with the risk of fire. The results of the study resulted in an accuracy of 82.13%, by comparing the classification results with the dataset associated with the test. An important consideration to be done for future studies is that the dataset analyzed was unbalanced, impacting considerably the results presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it