Energy-Delay Tradeoff in Helper-Assisted NOMA-MEC Systems: A Four-Sided Matching Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper designs a helper-assisted offloading strategy in non-orthogonal multiple access enabled mobile edge computing systems, in order to guarantee the quality of service of the energy/delay-sensitive user equipments (UEs). To achieve a tradeoff between the energy consumption and the delay, we introduce a performance metric called energy-delay tradeoff. Aiming at the maximal energy-delay tradeoff minimization, the joint optimization of user association, resource block (RB) assignment, power allocation, task assignment, and computation resource allocation is formulated as a non-convex problem with coupled continuous and 0-1 variables. To tackle this challenging problem, we decompose it as a two-level problem. For the inner-level problem, an iterative parametric convex approximation (IPCA) algorithm is proposed. Then, based on the solution obtained from the inner-level problem, we model the outer-level problem as a four-sided matching problem, and then propose a low-complexity four-sided UE-RB-helper-server matching (FS-URHSM) algorithm. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the IPCA algorithm can converge to a stationary Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point and the FS-URHSM algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a stable matching with polynomial complexity. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of proposed algorithms in terms of the energy consumption and the delay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".