A process‐based water stable isotope mixing model for plant water sourcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in water are common tools for investigating water uptake apportionment, but many of the existing methods rely on simple linear mixing approaches that do not mechanistically incorporate additional information about site physical properties and conditions. Here, we develop a ‘physically based root water uptake isotope mixing estimation’ model (PRIME) that combines a continuous and parametric probability density function for root water uptake with site physical data in a process‐based linear mixing framework. To demonstrate the application of PRIME, water uptake patterns of boreal forest Pinus banksiana trees were estimated on four dates in 2019. To aid in validation, estimates were compared with that of the Bayesian linear mixing model framework, MixSIAR. The two approaches provided similar results, but due to its continuous and parametric nature, PRIME provided estimates of superior resolution, certainty, and model parsimony. Although both models incorporate additional physical information into their mixing frameworks, PRIME does so in a mechanistic manner, thereby reflecting the relevant hydrological processes more effectively than the purely empirical approach taken by MixSIAR. Furthermore, because PRIME uses a continuous function to describe the predicted uptake pattern, it allows users to quantify water uptake with essentially infinite resolution, through integration over the desired depth ranges. These findings demonstrate the advantages of utilizing a continuous, parametric, and process‐based mixing model to estimate root water uptake apportionment, thus providing a relatively simple yet powerful tool with which to approach plant water sourcing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".