Quantifying negative selection in human 3ʹ UTRs uncovers constrained targets of RNA-binding proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many non-coding variants associated with phenotypes occur in 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs), and may affect interactions with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. However, identifying functional 3' UTR variants has proven difficult. We use allele frequencies from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) to identify classes of 3' UTR variants under strong negative selection in humans. We develop intergenic mutability-adjusted proportion singleton (iMAPS), a generalized measure related to MAPS, to quantify negative selection in non-coding regions. This approach, in conjunction with in vitro and in vivo binding data, identifies precise RBP binding sites, miRNA target sites, and polyadenylation signals (PASs) under strong selection. For each class of sites, we identify thousands of gnomAD variants under selection comparable to missense coding variants, and find that sites in core 3' UTR regions upstream of the most-used PAS are under strongest selection. Together, this work improves our understanding of selection on human genes and validates approaches for interpreting genetic variants in human 3' UTRs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".