Energetic and Ecological Benefits of Heat Pump Application in Energy Transformation Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1900, Nikola Tesla published a paper: The problem of increasing human energy, stressing that generating electricity from burning of coal we would be destroying material, which would be a barbarous process. This message is still vitally important, and one method to mitigate the barbarous effects is e.g., application of heat pump. Its benefits are twofold: economic and ecological. Heat pump reduces fuel consumption and lessens the burden on the environment through combustion products. As example, we have quantified its application in the area of heating, but the results obtained are extendable to any energy system. The most significant parameters are the efficiency of the energy conversion process and the COP of the heat pump. When the product of these two parameters is equal to one, part of energy losses, occurring in the energy conversion process which is associated with the heat pump application, can be completely utilised by the heat pump as useful heat. This is of paramount importance for reduction of energy conversion losses and protection of the environment. In general, both the fuel consumption and amount of combustion products decrease with increasing COP, that is, with increasing evaporation temperature and/or decreasing condensation temperature of the working fluid used in the heat pump.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".