MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390510757 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2024.2.072

MULTILINEAGE DIFFERENTIATION OF C2C12 CELLS AND MONOCYTES IN VITRO WITHIN A 6-BROMOINDIRUBIN-3’-OXIME-INCORPORATED CHITOSAN-BASED SCAFFOLD FOR ENHANCED BONE REGENERATION

2024· article· en· W4390510757 on OpenAlexaffabout
Celine J. Agnes, Monzur Murshed, Bettina M. Willie, Maryam Tabrizian

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteocalcinC2C12Cell biologyCellular differentiationOsteopontinScaffoldOsteoblastViability assayAlkaline phosphataseBone healingChemistryIn vitroBiologyBiochemistryBiomedical engineeringImmunologyAnatomyMyocyteMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical size bone defects deriving from large bone loss are an unmet clinical challenge1. To account for disadvantages with clinical treatments, researchers focus on designing biological substitutes, which mimic endogenous healing through osteogenic differentiation promotion. Some studies have however suggested that this notion fails to consider the full complexity of native bone with respect to the interplay between osteoclast and osteoblasts, thus leading to the regeneration of less functional tissue2. The objective of this research is to assess the ability of our laboratory's previously developed 6-Bromoindirubin-3’-Oxime (BIO) incorporated guanosine diphosphate crosslinked chitosan scaffold in promoting multilineage differentiation of myoblastic C2C12 cells and monocytes into osteoblasts and osteoclasts1, 3, 4. BIO addition has been previously demonstrated to promote osteogenic differentiation in cell cultures5, but implementation of a co-culture model here is expected to encourage crosstalk thus further supporting differentiation, as well as the secretion of regulatory molecules and cytokines2. Biocompatibility testing of both cell types is performed using AlamarBlue for metabolic activity, and nucleic acid staining for distribution. Osteoblastic differentiation is assessed through quantification of ALP and osteopontin secretion, as well as osteocalcin and mineralization staining. Differentiation into osteoclasts is verified using SEM and TEM, qPCR, and TRAP staining. Cellular viability of C2C12 cells and monocytes was maintained when cultured separately in scaffolds with and without BIO for 21 days. Both scaffold variations showed a characteristic increase in ALP secretion from day 1 to 7, indicating early differentiation but BIO-incorporated sponges yielded higher values compared to controls. SEM and TEM imaging confirmed initial aggregation and fusion of monocytes on the scaffold's surface, but BIO addition appeared to result in smoother cell surfaces indicating a change in morphology. Late-stage differentiation assessment and co-culture work in the scaffold are ongoing, but initial results show promise in the material's ability to support multilineage differentiation. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Collaborative Health Research Program (CHRP) through CIHR and NSERC, as well as Canada Research Chair – Tier 1 in Regenerative Medicine and Nanomedicine, and the FRQ-S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207