Sistem Rekomendasi Film Dengan Pendekatan Ontologi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Movie is one of the easiest and cheapest entertainment human can experience. Nevertheless, there is an abundant amount of movies to watch. In the US and Canada alone, there are 403 movies produced in 2021. That is a huge amount of movies one person can watch. Most of people usually confused in determining which movies to watch, especially after watching a movie that truly suits their taste. Determining a decision in choosing a movie to watch requires a recommendation system. The recommendation system will provide decisions with good accuracy if it is collaborated with the Semantic Web using ontologies. In this study, researchers aims to build a movie ontology design which will later be used as a processing database in a movie selection recommendation system. In building the ontology, researcher requires the Methontology method. The methontology stages are performing the stages of specification, knowledge acquisition, conseptualizationo, integration, implementation, evaluation, and documentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it