Variability of morphology in beat-to-beat photoplethysmographic waveform quantified with unsupervised wave-shape manifold learning for clinical assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the beat-to-beat fluctuation of the photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform. The motivation is that morphology variability extracted from the arterial blood pressure (ABP) has been found to correlate with baseline condition and short-term surgical outcome of the patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Numerous interactions of physiological mechanisms regulating the cardiovascular system could underlie the variability of morphology. We used the unsupervised manifold learning algorithm, Dynamic Diffusion Map, to quantify the multivariate waveform morphological variation. Due to the physical principle of light absorption, PPG waveform signals are more susceptible to artifact and are nominally used only for visual inspection of data quality in clinical medical environment. But on the other hand, the noninvasive, easy-to-use nature of PPG grants a wider range of biomedical application, which inspired us to investigate the variability of morphology information from PPG waveform signal. We developed data analysis techniques to improve the performance and validated with the real-life clinical database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".