MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390536525 · doi:10.62115/rbfp.2023.3(3)76-85

Liberação miofascial instrumentalizada lombar e abdominal reduz dismenorreia primaria

2023· article· en· W4390536525 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Eduarda Zanella

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Fisioterapia Pelvica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbarPhysical therapyMyofascial releaseAbdominal painBack painSurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Primary dysmenorrhea is a prevalent condition that impacts the ADLs and work activities of billions of women, and new treatment techniques are needed. Aims: To test a protocol composed of three manual techniques used on primary dysmenorrhea. Method: The pain of 8 patients was assessed before and after the intervention using McGill, VAS and PSST. The intervention consisted of abdominal, sacral and lumbar release maneuvers with a “square” instrument of the IASTM® myofascial release method, one session per week for four weeks. Results: All women showed a significant reduction (average of -80%) in pain, with around a third being cured of pain. The least notable result was in the patient with a BMI compatible with obesity. Conclusion: The proposed instrumented myofascial release maneuvers are efficient in relieving primary dysmenorrhea and other PMS symptoms, but special attention should be focused on obese women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Fisioterapia PelvicaSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207