Research on Image-to-Image Generation and Optimization Methods Based on Diffusion Model Compared with Traditional Methods: Taking Façade as the Optimization Object
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The intersection of technology and culture has become a topic of great interest worldwide, with China's development embracing this integration as an essential direction. One critical area where these two fields converge is in the inheritance, translation, and creative design of cultural heritage. In line with this trend, our study explores the potential of stable diffusion to produce highly detailed and visually stunning building façades. We start by providing an overall survey and algorithm fundamentals of the generative deep learning models used so far, namely, GAN and Diffusion models. Then, we present our methodology for using Diffusion Model to generate architecture façades. We then demonstrate how the fine-tuning is done for Stable Diffusion is done to yield optimal performance and then evaluate four different training methods of SD. We also compare existing GAN based façade generation method with our Diffusion based method. Our results show that our Diffusion-based approach outperforms existing methods in terms of detail and quality, highlighting the potential of stable diffusion in generating visually appealing building façades. This research contributes to the growing body of work on the integration of technology and culture in architecture and offers insights into the potential of stable diffusion for creative design applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".