MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390540016 · doi:10.59957/jctm.v59.i1.2024.21

DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMBINED DEFORMATION TREATMENT “ECAP-DRAWING” INTO PRODUCTION

2024· article· en· W4390540016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsArcelorMittal (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressingBimetallic stripSevere plastic deformationDeformation (meteorology)Materials scienceProduction (economics)GOST (hash function)Channel (broadcasting)Production costMetallurgyManufacturing engineeringMechanical engineeringComposite materialComputer scienceMetalEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combined innovative technology developed in this article makes it possible to produce bimetallic long products in the form of bars and wires with improved mechanical properties, due to the ultrafine grain structure of the material, with less energy and labor costs and implementation of continuity principle in industrial enterprises of metal-working industry. The combination of equal-channel angular pressing with drawing makes it possible not only to harden the composition, but at the same time to preserve important and regulated by a number of GOST plastic properties of the products. This circumstance favorably distinguishes the method under study from other (traditional) types of deformation treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it