Control of Hypertension in Pregnant Women in Secondary Health Facilities in Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension is among the non-communicable diseases that complicate pregnancies in women. Diagnosis and control of this condition are important in reducing the risk of maternal and foetal mortality. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence and control of hypertension among pregnant women visiting secondary health care facilities in four Local Government Areas in Lagos (2) and Abuja (Federal Capital Territory) (2), Nigeria. Our findings showed that there was a high prevalence of hypertension in these facilities (50%). Our finding also revealed that the overall level of control was 30.45%, which decreased with time in the course of the management. The control was highest in the first quarter and lowest in the third (last) quarter. The consistent and appropriate use of antihypertensives is important to prevent the complications associated with non-communicable diseases like hypertension during pregnancy. Healthcare providers should therefore advocate early diagnosis and management of hypertension during pregnancy. Keywords: Control, Hypertension, Non-communicable diseases, Pregnancy, Secondary healthcare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".