MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390545031 · doi:10.3390/coatings14010068

Effect of Carbon-Doped Cu(Ni) Alloy Film for Barrierless Copper Interconnect

2024· article· en· W4390545031 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Wang, Xu Guo, Songtao Dong, Yanxin Qiao, Jian Chen, Zhen Yan, Rong Shu, Lei Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueCoatings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper Interconnects and Reliability
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationJiangsu Science and Technology DepartmentNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceDiffusion barrierAlloySiliconSputter depositionSubstrate (aquarium)DopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CopperLayer (electronics)Barrier layerPhotoemission spectroscopyDiffusionCarbon fibersMetallurgyX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySputteringChemical engineeringThin filmComposite materialNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsChemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the barrier properties and diffusion behavior of carbon-doped Cu(Ni) alloy film were investigated. The films were fabricated using magnetron sputtering on a barrierless silicon substrate. X-ray diffraction patterns and electric resistivity results demonstrated that the barrierless Cu(NiC) alloy films remained thermally stable up to 650 °C. Transmission electron microscopy images provided the presence of a self-formed diffusion layer between the Cu(NiC) alloy and Si substrate. The effect of carbon-doped atoms on the diffusion behavior of the Cu(NiC) films was analyzed by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy depth profile. Results revealed that carbon doping can improve the barrier properties of barrierless Cu(Ni) film. Moreover, X-ray photoemission spectroscopy was performed to examine the chemical states of the self-formed layer at the Cu(NiC)/Si interface. The self-formed diffusion layer was found to consist of Cu metal, Ni metal, Si, Cu2O, NiO, and SiO2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCoatingsSame topicCopper Interconnects and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207