MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390545439 · doi:10.7759/cureus.51588

Patients’ Dreams and Unreal Experiences During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Hospitalization

2024· article· en· W4390545439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Konstantina Dimou, A. L. Batiridou, Fotios Tatsis, Spiros Georgakis, Zoe Konstanti, Γεώργιος Παπαθανάκος, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Elena Dragioti, M. Gouva, Vasilios Koulouras

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChecklistDeliriumIntensive care unitMEDLINEMedicineRecallIntensive careCritical appraisalPsychiatryAnxietyPsychologyClinical psychologyPsychosocialSystematic reviewScopusIntensive care medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the intensive care unit (ICU), patients often experience fragmented memories, primarily comprising dreams and illusions. These experiences can impact psychosocial well-being, correlating with post-traumatic stress symptoms and heightened anxiety. Understanding these phenomena is crucial for holistic care. To systematically explore patients' perspectives concerning the recollection of dreams and unreal encounters during their stay in the ICU, considering pertinent clinical conditions and potential influencing factors, we conducted a comprehensive search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until November 20, 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. From an initial pool of 288 records, a thorough screening for eligibility resulted in the inclusion of nine studies for this systematic review. These selected studies underwent evaluation using either the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Checklist or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All studies categorized dreams into three main types: positive, distressing (including nightmares), and neutral experiences. These were further detailed based on aspects such as time, space, senses, emotions, and distinguishing between reality and unreality. Two studies found associations between dreams and conditions like Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), mental abnormalities, and delirium. In one study, GBS patients had more vivid dreams, hallucinations, and delusions compared to ICU control group patients; delirious patients tend to report more frequent frightening dreams. Patients in the ICU who recalled dreams often had more severe illness, longer stays, and higher ventilation frequency. Notably, a prolonged ICU stay significantly predicted the likelihood of dream recall, as consistently observed in three other studies. This suggests that patients with prolonged ICU stays, experiencing higher dream recall, underwent extended treatments. This systematic exploration of patients' perspectives on fragmented memories underscores the connections between these experiences, clinical conditions such as GBS and delirium, and extended ICU stays. Recognizing and attending to these psychological aspects in post-ICU care is critical for alleviating the enduring emotional consequences for patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207