MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing Trust and Privacy in E-Commerce Platforms by Preventing DNS Heavyweight Attacks

2023· article· en· W4390551068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ankita Kumari, Ishu Sharma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLoginComputer securityDomain (mathematical analysis)E-commerceIdentity theftIdentification (biology)Domain Name SystemWorld Wide WebThe InternetInternet privacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E-commerce is the largest platform of online business that provides users with a virtual environment for interaction related to buying and selling tasks. People prefer to purchase online to have more variety of products and to get items at discounted prices. But data privacy is a big concern in such scenarios where the user is communicating with E-Commerce platforms using their personal and financial details. The attacker can easily target the user and breach the data/ information and login credentials of the user by cyberattacks like domain name system attacks. Ingenious solutions for the early identification of Domain Name assaults for various e-commerce platforms may now be available as machine learning solutions can be deployed in real network environments as well. The strategy proposed in this research paper serves as a protective barrier for the Ecommerce platforms to prevent the breaching the information. The methodology is suggested to employ a trained machine smart loader chip for attack detection to make sure that only allowed data packets are transmitted to the domain name system server of the e-commerce system. The dataset used to train and test artificial intelligence algorithms is derived from the data repository of the Canadian Institute for Cyber Security. According to the findings, the decision tree classifier is the most effective technique for spotting domain name system attack infections at an early stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207