MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390563203 · doi:10.1177/07316844231225079

Nonlinear torsional vibration and dynamic post-buckling responses of spiral stiffened functionally graded porous cylindrical shells

2024· article· en· W4390563203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonlinear systemGalerkin methodViscoelasticityVibrationBucklingShell (structure)StiffnessStructural engineeringDiscretizationMaterials scienceMaterial propertiesMechanicsMathematical analysisComposite materialPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study employs a semi-analytical approach to investigate the nonlinear torsional vibration and dynamic torsional post-buckling (DTPB) responses of spiral stiffened functionally graded (FG) porous (SSFGP) cylindrical shells. These shells are resting on a generalized nonlinear viscoelastic foundation (GNVEF). This foundation consists of a dual-parameter Winkler-Pasternak foundation augmented by a Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model. The model includes nonlinear cubic stiffness and takes damping effects into consideration. Within the scope of this research, two variations of SSFGP cylindrical shells are examined: those characterized by non-uniform and uniform porosity distributions. Employing the Donnell shell theory, von-Kármán nonlinear geometric assumptions, and Galerkin’s method, a discretized nonlinear governing equation is derived to analyze the behaviors of the shells. Consequently, explicit formulations for dynamic torsional load are meticulously obtained. The findings of the present study are validated by comparing them with the outcomes documented in existing literature, as well as through alignment with the P-T method. This research delves into the system’s nonlinear behaviors, with scrutinization of the effects of diverse factors such as material and geometrical parameters. The researchers and engineers in this field may use the findings of this research as benchmarks for their design and research of SSFGP cylindrical shells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it