A Study on the Impact of Industrial Robot Development on the Economy – A Case Study of China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of industrial robot development on the economy has long been a subject of keen interest. This research aims to explore the role of industrial robots in the Chinese economy and the factors influencing their impact. This is achieved through an analysis of the scale of the industrial robot market, its applications, the localization process, and its effects on employment and production efficiency. In the course of this study, we review the rapid growth of the Chinese manufacturing sector and the increasing adoption of industrial robots. With technological advancements, industrial robots have achieved significant milestones in fields such as automobile manufacturing and electronics production. Subsequently, this paper delves into the repercussions of industrial robots on the Chinese economy. Data indicates that the widespread use of industrial robots has significantly enhanced production efficiency, lowered production costs, and improved product quality. Furthermore, the paper scrutinizes the progress of domestication in the industrial robot sector, highlighting China's positive strides in enhancing its capacity for independent research and development, as well as manufacturing. Consequently, the rapid development of industrial robots has exerted a multifaceted impact on the Chinese economy, fostering both production efficiency and industrial upgrading, while also giving rise to a series of employment and societal issues. In the future, China should continue to intensify its efforts in technological innovation and talent development to better address the challenges and opportunities arising from the development of industrial robots, thereby promoting sustained and healthy economic growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".