Bibliographic record
Abstract
italics=figure Adlerschild (Eagle's Shield), 251 highest civilian award (bestowed upon Sering, 1932), 221 Africa, 12, 126, 139 African Americans, 6 agrarian economists, 4, 202, 213, 234 agrarian economy link with number of soldiers available, 120, 121, 133 agrarian elite, 93, 96, 216 agrarian history, 64, 244 agrarian laws, 207, 218 Agrarian League.See Bund der Landwirte agrarian sector, 41, 92, 202, 215, 218, 222, 233, 250 agrarianism, 2, 3, 7, 28, 111 agricultural colonialism, 86 agricultural workers, 99, 124, 267, See also seasonal workers agriculture, 17, 18, 41, 54, 83, 96, 125, 232, 270, 274 inheritance law (Schleswig-Holstein), 126-128 Aikens, James Cox, 51 Alldeutsche Blätter, 156 Alsace, 4, 14,[28][29] 63, 211, 213, 257 demographic problem, 30 Alsace-Lorraine, 29-35, 65, 165, 196, 197 German annexation (1871), 29 government structure, 30 Alsatians, 28, 185 emigration to France (by 1910), 30 Althoff, Friedrich, 64-65, 87, 121 retirement (1907), 122 Altreich, 165, 166, 176, 226 Old Territories (Germany proper), 148 American Civil War, 102Canadian response (1867), 119 American Empire, 10, 119 American farming frontier, 60-62 American North, 66, 67, 140 American South, 66, 102, 137, 140 how not to conduct inner colonization (Sering), 136 land-holding elite, 88 American West, 2, 5,[8][9][10][11][12][13] 19, 26, 65, 70, 71, 82, 86, 88, 89, 97, 104, 129, 208, 224 and American Civil War, 102 German migrants, 89 versus German East (advantages and disadvantages), 98-99 American western frontier, 10, 85, 279 Amerikanisierung, 110 Ames (Iowa): Agricultural School, 61 Anderson, General Adna, 49 Anerbenrecht (inheritance law), 75, 227 Angles, 127 animal fodder, 150 antisemitism, 84, 110, 182, 199, 204, 238, 240, 265 Anzaldúa, Gloria: Borderlands (1987), 20 Arbeiterstand (class of workers), 75 Archiv für innere Kolonisation (AFK), 107, 129, 130-134, 146, 148, 149, 153, 218, 222, 224, 261 became house journal of GFK, 130 bibliography (in 1912 special issue), 132 biological views seeping in (1921), 205 economic report (Weidenfeld, 1912), 132 Erbhofrecht debate (1933), 227-228 first postwar [WWI] issue, 193 international focus, 271 last version ceased publication (1981), 274 mood of frustration and impotence (1923), 200 New Paths of German Colonial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.759 | 0.660 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".