MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390569826 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200122

Childhood-Onset Myopathy With Preserved Ambulation Caused by a Recurrent <i>ADSSL1</i> Missense Variant

2024· article· en· W4390569826 on OpenAlexafffund
Dipti Baskar, Kiran Polavarapu, Veeramani Preethish‐Kumar, Seena Vengalil, Saraswati Nashi, Ana Töpf, Aneesha Thomas, Sai Bhargava Sanka, Deepak Menon, Kosha Srivastava, Gautham Arunachal, Bevinahalli N. Nandeesh, Hanns Lochmüller, Atchayaram Nalini

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEuropean CommissionMuscular Dystrophy Canada
KeywordsMyopathyMedicineInternal medicineWeaknessMissense mutationMuscle weaknessHyporeflexiaEndocrinologyGastroenterologyPathologyCardiologySurgeryBiologyGeneticsMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: gene located in chromosome 14q32.33 cause a distal myopathy phenotype. In this study, we present the clinical and genetic attributes of 6 Indian patients with this myopathy. Methods: myopathy. Details were obtained from the medical records. Results: gene. Discussion: myopathy with unusual manifestations in this rare disorder. Because the variant c.781G>A (p.Asp261Asn) is the most common mutation among Indian patients similar to other Asian cohorts, this finding could be useful for genetic screening of suspected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology GeneticsSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207