MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390579708 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44462-x

Publisher Correction: Exploiting redundancy in large materials datasets for efficient machine learning with less data

2024· erratum· en· W4390579708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kangming Li, Daniel Persaud, Kamal Choudhary, Brian DeCost, Michael T. Greenwood, Jason Hattrick‐Simpers

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine InstituteVector InstituteNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Computer scienceMachine learningData miningArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The copyright for this article was incorrectly given as ‘The Author(s)’ but should have been ‘His Majesty the King in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources’. The original article has been corrected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0060.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207