Integration of multi-omics technologies for molecular diagnosis in ataxia patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Episodic ataxias are rare neurological disorders characterized by recurring episodes of imbalance and coordination difficulties. Obtaining definitive molecular diagnoses poses challenges, as clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, and literature on the underlying genetics is limited. While the advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has significantly contributed to Mendelian disorders genetics, interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and other limitations inherent to individual methods still leaves many patients undiagnosed. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multi-omics for the identification and validation of molecular candidates in a cohort of complex cases of ataxia with episodic presentation. Methods: Eight patients lacking molecular diagnosis despite extensive clinical examination were recruited following standard genetic testing. Whole genome and RNA sequencing were performed on samples isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Integration of expression and splicing data facilitated genomic variants prioritization. Subsequently, long-read sequencing played a crucial role in the validation of those candidate variants. Results: Whole genome sequencing uncovered pathogenic variants in four genes (SPG7, ATXN2, ELOVL4, PMPCB). A missense and a nonsense variant, both previously reported as likely pathogenic, configured in trans in individual #1 (SPG7: c.2228T>C/p.I743T, c.1861C>T/p.Q621*). An ATXN2 microsatellite expansion (CAG32) in another late-onset case. In two separate individuals, intronic variants near splice sites (ELOVL4: c.541 + 5G>A; PMPCB: c.1154 + 5G>C) were predicted to induce loss-of-function splicing, but had never been reported as disease-causing. Long-read sequencing confirmed the compound heterozygous variants configuration, repeat expansion length, as well as splicing landscape for those pathogenic variants. A potential genetic modifier of the ATXN2 expansion was discovered in ZFYVE26 (c.3022C>T/p.R1008*). Conclusion: Despite failure to identify pathogenic variants through clinical genetic testing, the multi-omics approach enabled the molecular diagnosis in 50% of patients, also giving valuable insights for variant prioritization in remaining cases. The findings demonstrate the value of long-read sequencing for the validation of candidate variants in various scenarios. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of leveraging complementary omics technologies to unravel the underlying genetics in patients with unresolved rare diseases such as ataxia. Molecular diagnoses not only hold significant promise in improving patient care management, but also alleviates the burden of diagnostic odysseys, more broadly enhancing quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".