MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390584565 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1304711

Integration of multi-omics technologies for molecular diagnosis in ataxia patients

2024· article· en· W4390584565 on OpenAlexafffund
Sébastien Audet, Valérie Triassi, Myriam Gelinas, Nab Legault-Cadieux, Vincent Ferraro, Antoine Duquette, Martine Tétreault

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersCourtois FoundationAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNational Ataxia FoundationUniversité de MontréalGénome QuébecMcGill University
KeywordsSpinocerebellar ataxiaGeneticsTrinucleotide repeat expansionBiologyWhole genome sequencingMissense mutationComputational biologyDNA sequencingMendelian inheritanceGenomicsRNA splicingGenomeBioinformaticsPhenotypeGeneRNAAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Episodic ataxias are rare neurological disorders characterized by recurring episodes of imbalance and coordination difficulties. Obtaining definitive molecular diagnoses poses challenges, as clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, and literature on the underlying genetics is limited. While the advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has significantly contributed to Mendelian disorders genetics, interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and other limitations inherent to individual methods still leaves many patients undiagnosed. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multi-omics for the identification and validation of molecular candidates in a cohort of complex cases of ataxia with episodic presentation. Methods: Eight patients lacking molecular diagnosis despite extensive clinical examination were recruited following standard genetic testing. Whole genome and RNA sequencing were performed on samples isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Integration of expression and splicing data facilitated genomic variants prioritization. Subsequently, long-read sequencing played a crucial role in the validation of those candidate variants. Results: Whole genome sequencing uncovered pathogenic variants in four genes ( SPG7 , ATXN2 , ELOVL4 , PMPCB ). A missense and a nonsense variant, both previously reported as likely pathogenic, configured in trans in individual #1 ( SPG7 : c.2228T>C/p.I743T, c.1861C>T/p.Q621*). An ATXN2 microsatellite expansion (CAG 32 ) in another late-onset case. In two separate individuals, intronic variants near splice sites ( ELOVL4 : c.541 + 5G>A; PMPCB : c.1154 + 5G>C) were predicted to induce loss-of-function splicing, but had never been reported as disease-causing. Long-read sequencing confirmed the compound heterozygous variants configuration, repeat expansion length, as well as splicing landscape for those pathogenic variants. A potential genetic modifier of the ATXN2 expansion was discovered in ZFYVE26 (c.3022C>T/p.R1008*). Conclusion: Despite failure to identify pathogenic variants through clinical genetic testing, the multi-omics approach enabled the molecular diagnosis in 50% of patients, also giving valuable insights for variant prioritization in remaining cases. The findings demonstrate the value of long-read sequencing for the validation of candidate variants in various scenarios. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of leveraging complementary omics technologies to unravel the underlying genetics in patients with unresolved rare diseases such as ataxia. Molecular diagnoses not only hold significant promise in improving patient care management, but also alleviates the burden of diagnostic odysseys, more broadly enhancing quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207