Harnessing the Power of the Stock Market for Social Good: Establishing an Islamic Social Stock Exchange in Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigates the feasibility and implications of introducing an Islamic Social Stock Exchange (SSE) in Malaysia by drawing insights from global SSE frameworks. The objectives of the research are to: analyze the concept and framework of SSEs in the United Kingdom, Spain, Singapore, and Canada; identify the benefits and impact of SSEs on social and economic development; study the possible challenges in introducing an Islamic SSE in Malaysia; and explore the public's appetite and motives to invest in such an exchange. Employing qualitative research methods, such as literature reviews, surveys, and interviews, the study unveils a spectrum of SSE frameworks, highlighting their diverse positive impacts on social and economic development. Simultaneously, challenges emerge in the realms of Shariah compliance, listing fees, and public awareness. The findings not only underscore the practical significance of these insights but also emphasize their pivotal role in shaping the potential development of an Islamic SSE in Malaysia. This research contributes to enriching shared understanding of global SSE practices, fostering progress in Malaysia's social, economic, and environmental spheres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".