Prospective motion correction for brain <scp>MRI</scp> using spherical navigators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate for the first time the feasibility of performing prospective motion correction using spherical navigators (SNAVs). METHODS: SNAVs were interleaved in a 3D FLASH sequence with an additional short baseline scan (6.8 s) for fast rotation estimation. Assessment of SNAV-based prospective motion correction was performed in six volunteers. Participant motion was guided using randomly generated stepwise prompts as well as prompts derived from real motion cases. Experiments were performed on a 3 T MRI scanner using a 32-channel head coil. RESULTS: When optimized for real-time application, SNAV-based motion estimates were computed in 25.8 ± 1.3 ms. Phantom-based quantification of rotation and translation accuracy indicated mean absolute errors of 0.10 ± 0.09° and 0.25 ± 0.14 mm, respectively. Implementing SNAV-based motion estimates for prospective motion correction led to a clear improvement in image quality with minimal increase in scan time (<5%). CONCLUSION: Optimization of SNAV processing for real-time application enables prospective motion correction with low latency and minimal scan time requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".