Novel Alleles from Cicer reticulatum L. for Genetic Improvement of Cultivated Chickpeas Identified through Genome Wide Association Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The availability of wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum L.) accessions has the potential to be used for the improvement of important traits in cultivated chickpeas. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the phenotypic and genetic variations of chickpea progeny derived from interspecific crosses between C. arietinum and C. reticulatum, and to establish the association between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and a series of important agronomic traits in chickpea. A total of 486 lines derived from interspecific crosses between C. arietinum (CDC Leader) and 20 accessions of C. reticulatum were evaluated at different locations in Saskatchewan, Canada in 2017 and 2018. Significant variations were observed for seed weight per plant, number of seeds per plant, thousand seed weight, and plant biomass. Path coefficient analysis showed significant positive direct effects of the number of seeds per plant, thousand seed weight, and biomass on the total seed weight. Cluster analysis based on the agronomic traits generated six groups that allowed the identification of potential heterotic groups within the interspecific lines for yield improvement and resistance to ascochyta blight disease. Genotyping of the 381 interspecific lines using a modified genotyping by sequencing (tGBS) generated a total of 14,591 SNPs. Neighbour-joining cluster analysis using the SNP data grouped the lines into 20 clusters. The genome wide association analysis identified 51 SNPs that had significant associations with different traits. Several candidate genes associated with early flowering and yield components were identified. The candidate genes and the significant SNP markers associated with different traits have a potential to aid the trait introgression in the breeding program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".