Suporte nutricional a recém-nascidos de unidades neonatais na maternidade pública do Tocantins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: o presente estudo transversal retrospectivo descreve os perfis de saúde e nutrição de recém-nascidos internados em uma maternidade pública, comparando-os em relação à maturidade ao nascer e ao tipo de alimentação recebida. Métodos: os dados foram coletados das fichas de receptores do banco de leite humano e analisados no software Statistical Package for Social Sciences 2.0. Resultados: ao se compararem as crianças prematuras e a termo, bem como pelo tipo de alimentação recebida, observaram-se diferenças significativas entre todos os parâmetros, exceto em relação ao incremento ponderal diário. O declínio do estado nutricional e o insuficiente incremento ponderal observados apontam para o desafio de nutrir adequadamente as crianças internadas em unidades neonatais. Conclusão: diante dos impactos da prematuridade e da internação na mortalidade infantil, ressalta-se a importância do suporte nutricional adequado e de qualidade, para a melhoria do estado nutricional e, consequentemente, do estado geral de saúde de neonatos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".