MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390597136 · doi:10.5383/juspn.16.01.006

An Enhanced Fuzzy Clustering to Pattern Recognition for Cloud Computing, by using Model Aggregation and Model Selection

2022· article· en· W4390597136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisCloud computingComputer scienceFuzzy clusteringData miningFuzzy logicAdaptive resonance theoryArtificial intelligenceMachine learningModel selection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical schemes research on clustering models has been quite intensive in the past decade. Many models have been proposed to address the clustering tasks. Most clustering models are influenced by presentation order, complex shapes, architecture configuration, and learning instability. Hence, in the present study, a novel clustering-based method for cloud computing that provides an improvement in recognition rate, is described. The evaluation, based on 10-fold Cross-validation, showed that the proposed model, which is named BaggingCluster, yielded good results and performed better than Self Organizing Map and fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theory. Experimental studies demonstrate that our model provides an efficient model for cloud computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it