MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390597269 · doi:10.5383/juspn.15.01.006

Internet of Things (IoT) based Network Integrated with Sensor Nodes for Intruder Detection and Low Energy Consumption

2021· article· en· W4390597269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gauri Kalnoor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemEnergy consumptionWireless sensor networkCloud computingScheduling (production processes)Real-time computingKey (lock)Constant false alarm rateQueueing theoryDistributed computingComputer networkAlgorithmData miningComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applications in Internet of Things (IoT) for a large-scale Network which necessitates the storage resources and computing tasks, are gradually deployed in most of the wireless network environments. The computing model of traditional techniques when compared with features of cloud such as unlimited expansion, dynamic acquisition and payas-you-go are represented in different IoT architectures based on the conveniences of applications. Thus, one of the key challenges is to consider the service requirements when sensors are assigned to the tasks and the network performance is improved. In the presented work, the two-phase service system using Enhanced Bernoulli Vacation (EBV) scheduling algorithm and Intrusion Detection framework is proposed to minimize the energy consumed by the sensors while the service is provided. The performance variation of Virtual Machine (VM) and its achieved delay is considered, while first the tasks are divided into different tasks at different levels. The proposed work deals with a queuing system ‘M/G/1’ for Bernoulli Vacation scheduling model at one phase and intrusion detection technique at second phase. The sensing distance is also calculated with its density of network. The tasking scheduling algorithm is considered for execution cost and residual energy where the deadlines or threshold are proposed. The delay time, accuracy, detection rate and False Alarm Positive rate are evaluated during simulation time. Based on the work flows, experiments conducted are simulated for controlled tasks of IoT which demonstrates the algorithm achieving high success rate and that the network performs better when compared with the existing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive NetworksSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207